Qualcomm accuses Apple of infringing six patents in iPhone, iPad

Chipmaker Qualcomm opposition (QCOM.O) can raise the U.S. International Trade Commission to bar Apple opposition (AAPL.O) from commercialism some iPhones and iPads within the u.  s. that use chips created by rival Intel corporation (INTC.O) on the grounds that the devices infringe on six Qualcomm patents.
In a request that will broaden its legal battle with Apple, San Diego-based Qualcomm aforesaid it'll raise the U.S. ITC to ban imports of the infringing Apple devices. A connected case was filed in tribunal in Calif. on Th to request financial damages.
Qualcomm, that conjointly provides chips to Apple, aforesaid the six patents facilitate devices perform well while not exhausting the battery.
Apple referred reporters to its earlier comments on the dispute with
Qualcomm, that accuse Qualcomm of below the belt imposing what Apple calls a "tax" on Apple devices victimisation Qualcomm chips.
In its criticism to the ITC, Qualcomm asked the body to ban "iPhones that use cellular baseband processors aside from those equipped by Qualcomm’s affiliates." Qualcomm didn't name Intel, however Intel began supply chips for a few iPhones beginning with the iPhone seven.
Qualcomm has not alleged that Intel chips violate its patents however claims that the approach Apple implements them within the iPhone will. Intel declined comment.
Stacy Rasgon, AN analyst with composer, aforesaid ITC cases usually take sixteen months to conclude and also the case was unlikely to have an effect on Apple's tenth day iPhone launch expected this fall. "I doubt this puts lots of immediate pressure on Apple," Rasgon aforesaid.
There has been long-running tension between Qualcomm and Apple over Qualcomm's observe of taking a cut of the entire value of the phone in exchange for "modem" chips that facilitate phones use wireless networks knowledge plans.
The ITC may be a well-liked venue for patent disputes as a result of it handles cases comparatively quickly and might additional simply bar AN infringing product from the U.S. market than federal courts.
Animosity between the 2 firms burst into the open in Gregorian calendar month, when the U.S. Federal Trade Commission filed a case against Qualcomm and suspect it of victimisation "anticompetitive" ways to take care of its monopoly on a key semiconductor employed in mobile phones.
The FTC, that enforces law at the side of the Department of Justice, aforesaid that Qualcomm used its dominant position as a provider of bound chips to impose "onerous" offer and licensing terms on mobile phone makers and to weaken competitors.
Days later, Apple sued Qualcomm for $1 billion, accusive it of overcharging for chips and withholding secure rebates attributable to Apple's discussions with South Korea's antimonopoly regulators in their probe of Qualcomm.
Separately from this dispute, Qualcomm may be a major provider to each Apple and Samsung physics Co Ltd (005930.KS) for electronic equipment chips that connect phones to wireless networks.